Skip to content

Add a DeepWiki badge in the repo's README #3223

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

WSL0809
Copy link

@WSL0809 WSL0809 commented Jul 15, 2025

Add a DeepWiki badge in the repo's README to auto-refresh DeepWiki index

Copy link
Contributor

@Wauplin Wauplin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @WSL0809 , could you provide more information about that tool please? I don't want to prominent display a service that is not yet a standard and/or without knowing how good it is.

@WSL0809
Copy link
Author

WSL0809 commented Jul 17, 2025

Hi @WSL0809 , could you provide more information about that tool please? I don't want to prominent display a service that is not yet a standard and/or without knowing how good it is.您好,您能否提供有关该工具的更多信息?我不想突出展示尚未成为标准的服务和/或不知道它有多好。

Hi! First, I apologize for the sudden PR—I realize it might have seemed a bit out of the blue.

To briefly introduce DeepWiki, here’s the description from its official website:
“DeepWiki is a service that automatically generates and maintains an up-to-date index of documentation for your repository. It crawls your repo, organizes the content, and provides an easy-to-navigate overview to help users quickly find relevant information. By adding the DeepWiki badge, your project’s documentation index will stay synchronized and accessible.”

If you’d like to know more, I can share additional details or direct you to their website!(https://deepwiki.org/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants